The formal performance evaluation is generally what people think of when it comes to performance management, but remember, this is only part of the process. True performance improvement is more likely to come from your check-ins and conversations throughout the year, rather than this once a year meeting.
The heart of the review is the narrative which will help the employee understand why they received a particular score. Use the rating scale provided by your unit. However the best practice is to use a rating scale: Exceeds Expectations, Meets Expectations, or Requires Improvement.
Feedback should be shared throughout the year during check-ins, so the formal performance evaluation should be a simple summary of those conversations. Spend the majority of the review discussing your employee’s accomplishments (both what they achieved and how they achieved it), goals that were not achieved, strengths, and areas for improvement.
Financial rewards, such as merit increases and bonuses, are often the first thing that come to mind as ways to motivate and reward good performance. When financial rewards are limited or unavailable, many people wonder what to turn to. You may ask yourself: how can I motivate people to do good work? How can I give strong performers rewards and recognition that will keep them engaged? Learn more about how to effectively reward faculty and staff.
Performance evaluations are expected per the Board of Regents Policy: Employee Performance Evaluation and Development (pdf). Administrators and supervisors are accountable for ensuring that reviews are conducted and employees are expected to actively participate in the review process.